🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are watching intently to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a rising number of nations are considering parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our kids' childhood". A law may be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban is "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to approve a bill increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. Although it warns of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a good foundation," commented one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "supported by strong evidence".

Previously, momentum built behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and suitable for young users," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is largely happening at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced bills demanding guardian approval for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to mimic this lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from Europe and the US, further nations are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and its followers show that policymakers globally are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.